The Institutional Knowledge Test: Would Three Answers Match?
Most organizational problems don't announce themselves as patterns. They show up as a string of individually reasonable events — a delayed approval, a reopened decision, an exception made for one client — and it's rare that anyone connects them until the cost has already added up.
This is a short, self-administered check for spotting that risk early. It takes about a minute. It isn't a diagnosis — a pattern worth naming usually needs more evidence than a three-question checklist can hold. What it's built to do is simpler: tell you whether something you've noticed is worth a closer look, before it becomes expensive enough to force the issue.
Use it if it's relevant to what's on your mind right now. There's no form to fill out and nothing to sign up for — just use it.
The Institutional Knowledge Test
For multi-generational or long-tenured companies where a lot of what matters most has never had to be written down.
Pick your single most important field, safety, or quality standard — the one that, if it slipped, would matter most.
Ask three people at different levels of the company to describe it in their own words.
If you get three different answers, the standard isn't actually a company standard yet.
It's a standard passed down person-to-person — which is fragile in exactly the way most owners don't find out until it's tested.
If This Sounds Familiar
This checklist isn't a verdict. It's a way of testing whether something you've already noticed deserves a closer, more structured look — the kind that separates an isolated incident from a pattern that's quietly costing time, capacity, or money.
If you want to talk through what you found, a Pattern Discovery Call is a complimentary, no-pressure conversation to clarify what's actually going on before anyone commits to anything further.
Comments